Cary over at Racing the Horizons and I are submitting an abstract to the 2012 UCLA comparative literature graduate conference, “Spheres of Influence: Navigating World, Globe, and Planet.” The blogging culture we discuss will primarily engage the blogs of Chris Clarke, Ruth Nolan, and Shaun G. After a humbling amount of feedback, for which Cary and I are infinitely grateful, this is the second draft. We’ve decided to focus on the minor literatures and nix the genealogy for time constraints (though, if we try to publish this paper, it will certainly be included), updated some factoids, and reworded parts for clarity and force. As always, feedback is appreciated:
Since the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, nine utility-scale solar developments have been fast-tracked for approval in regions of the Mojave Desert, exposing over 50,000 acres of public lands to intensive development.[1] While the arguments that have supported these massive investments of public resources have not been homogenous, they have nonetheless orbited within a certain constellation of thinking about the desert as such. In October of 2010, at the groundbreaking of Brightsource’s Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, former California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger stated, “Some people look out into the desert and see miles and miles of emptiness […] I see miles and miles of gold mine.”[2] However, the two positions – the desert as emptiness and the desert as gold mine – are two sides of the same ecological nihilism, effacing the infinite complexities of desert ecologies: desert tortoise populations, 500 to 800 year old Mojave yucca groupings, and the myriad of other organisms that inhabit these lands are reduced to a narrative of human use-value in general, and profit in particular; therefore, continuing a tradition of westward expansion at least as old as the 19th century in which the American deserts were viewed as the “Creator’s dumping place”[3] and “an unbroken waste, barren, wild, and worthless.”[4]
The purpose of this paper is to provide a rich account of those minor literatures, including the emergence of a blogging culture by so-called “desert rats,” that contest these empty and destructive desert ontologies. Pejoratively labeled NIMBYs[5] by proponents of Big Solar in order to brand them as “small-minded” and selfish, caring more about local aesthetics than an imagined “global good,” we argue that these literatures take place, not simply on aesthetic grounds (though this is a justifiably strong influence), but also with deep scientific, political, and ontological commitments; with a fidelity to deserts as complex, diverse, and necessary ecosystems; and within a more robust, extra-human notion of what it means to inhabit desert worlds.
